GRID M60 8Q vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
When comparing GRID M60 8Q and Iris Plus Graphics 645, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID M60 8Q and Iris Plus Graphics 645 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID M60 8Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 here:
Main Specs
GRID M60 8Q | Iris Plus Graphics 645 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 8Q has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- GRID M60 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- GRID M60 8Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - in Laptops.
- GRID M60 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake.
- Core clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 257 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- GRID M60 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | − |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 159% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 46% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 126% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 333% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 215% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 309% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 178% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 375% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 43% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 84% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 242% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. |
Full Specs
GRID M60 8Q | Iris Plus Graphics 645 | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake |
Code name | GM204 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 10 July 2019 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 50.40 |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.103 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |