Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs NVS 510
When choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 645 and NVS 510, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Plus Graphics 645 and NVS 510.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645
NVS 510
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3/DDR4
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
NVS 510 has 133% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and NVS 510 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is used in Laptops, and NVS 510 - in Desktops.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is build with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake architecture, and NVS 510 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of NVS 510 is 497 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and NVS 510 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
0−1
ultra / 1080p
2−3
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
1−2
medium / 1080p
5−6
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than NVS 510.
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
0−1
medium / 1080p
8−9
−
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of NVS 510 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
100−110
60−65
medium / 768p
80−85
27−30
ultra / 1080p
35−40
7−8
QHD / 1440p
24−27
−
high / 768p
60−65
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 153% more, than NVS 510.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
12−14
0−1
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of NVS 510 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
65−70
45−50
medium / 768p
45−50
10−11
ultra / 1080p
21−24
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Dota 2 is 96% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
5−6
−
ultra / 1080p
5−6
−
4K / 2160p
3−4
−
low / 720p
12−14
0−1
medium / 1080p
5−6
−
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
−
low / 720p
45−50
21−24
medium / 1080p
12−14
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Fortnite is 113% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
8−9
0−1
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
0−1
medium / 1080p
9−10
0−1
low / 768p
40−45
18−20
medium / 768p
35−40
−
high / 1080p
7−8
0−1
ultra / 1080p
5−6
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Grand Theft Auto V is 121% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
3−4
−
ultra / 1080p
2−3
−
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
7−8
0−1
medium / 1080p
4−5
−
low / 768p
85−90
75−80
high / 1080p
80−85
27−30
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Minecraft is 60% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
low / 720p
24−27
8−9
medium / 1080p
16−18
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than NVS 510.
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
7−8
0−1
low / 768p
16−18
0−1
medium / 768p
12−14
−
high / 1080p
6−7
−
ultra / 1080p
5−6
−
low / 768p
80−85
45−50
medium / 768p
35−40
14−16
ultra / 1080p
14−16
0−1
high / 768p
30−33
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in World of Tanks is 100% more, than NVS 510.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645
NVS 510
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake
Kepler
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
GK107
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
10 July 2019
23 October 2012
Pipelines
48
192
Core clock speed
300 MHz
797 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
50.40
12.75
Floating-point performance
306.0 gflops
Length
160 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1782 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.51 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.103
1.1.126
CUDA
3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
17 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
