Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs NVS 810
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 645 and NVS 810, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Plus Graphics 645 stacks up against NVS 810, check out specs charts below.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645
NVS 810
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
68 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3/DDR4
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
8x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
NVS 810 has 353% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and NVS 810 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is used in Laptops, and NVS 810 - in Desktops.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is build with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake architecture, and NVS 810 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of NVS 810 is 602 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and NVS 810 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
2−3
ultra / 1080p
2−3
1−2
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
12−14
medium / 1080p
5−6
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than NVS 810.
ultra / 1080p
7−8
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
16−18
medium / 1080p
8−9
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Iris Plus Graphics 645 and NVS 810 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
100−110
120−130
medium / 768p
80−85
95−100
ultra / 1080p
35−40
40−45
QHD / 1440p
24−27
21−24
4K / 2160p
−
16−18
high / 768p
60−65
65−70
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 14% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
55−60
65−70
ultra / 1080p
12−14
20−22
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
65−70
80−85
medium / 768p
45−50
45−50
ultra / 1080p
21−24
21−24
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Dota 2 is 11% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
5−6
2−3
ultra / 1080p
5−6
2−3
4K / 2160p
3−4
2−3
low / 720p
12−14
10−12
medium / 1080p
5−6
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
12−14
10−11
ultra / 1080p
8−9
5−6
QHD / 1440p
−
4−5
low / 720p
45−50
50−55
medium / 1080p
12−14
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Fortnite is 5% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
8−9
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
16−18
18−20
medium / 1080p
9−10
8−9
Iris Plus Graphics 645 and NVS 810 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4.
low / 768p
40−45
45−50
medium / 768p
35−40
−
high / 1080p
7−8
4−5
ultra / 1080p
5−6
2−3
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
35−40
Iris Plus Graphics 645 and NVS 810 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V.
high / 1080p
3−4
2−3
ultra / 1080p
2−3
0−1
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
4−5
medium / 1080p
4−5
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
high / 1080p
80−85
80−85
ultra / 1080p
70−75
70−75
medium / 1080p
−
85−90
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Minecraft is 2% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
24−27
27−30
medium / 1080p
16−18
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than NVS 810.
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
7−8
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 16% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
16−18
10−11
medium / 768p
12−14
8−9
high / 1080p
6−7
4−5
ultra / 1080p
5−6
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
80−85
70−75
medium / 768p
35−40
35−40
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
high / 768p
30−33
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than NVS 810.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645
NVS 810
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake
Maxwell
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
GM107
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
10 July 2019
4 November 2015
Pipelines
48
512
Core clock speed
300 MHz
902 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
1033 MHz
Transistor count
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
50.40
33.06
Floating-point performance
2x 1,058 gflops
Length
198 mm
Memory bus width
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.103
1.1.126
CUDA
5.0
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
