Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs P106 090
When comparing Iris Plus Graphics 645 and P106 090, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 645 and P106 090 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
P106 090
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645 | P106 090 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- P106 090 has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and P106 090 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 is used in Laptops, and P106 090 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 is build with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake architecture, and P106 090 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of P106 090 is 1054 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and P106 090 - by 16 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Plus Graphics 645 and P106 090 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 117% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Dota 2 is 100% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Far Cry 5 is 216% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Fortnite is 140% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Forza Horizon 4 is 218% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Grand Theft Auto V is 121% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Metro Exodus is 250% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Minecraft is 37% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 171% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in World of Tanks is 56% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645 | P106 090 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake | Pascal |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GP106 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 10 July 2019 | 31 July 2017 |
Pipelines | 48 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1354 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | 1531 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Texture fill rate | 50.40 | 73.49 |
Floating-point performance | 2,352 gflops | |
Length | 250 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 6.1 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |