Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Quadro 2000
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro 2000, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Plus Graphics 645 stacks up against Quadro 2000, check out specs charts below.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645
Quadro 2000
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
62 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3/DDR4
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro 2000 has 313% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro 2000 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is used in Laptops, and Quadro 2000 - in Desktops.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is build with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake architecture, and Quadro 2000 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of Quadro 2000 is 325 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
1−2
ultra / 1080p
2−3
0−1
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
10−12
medium / 1080p
5−6
2−3
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 40% more, than Quadro 2000.
ultra / 1080p
7−8
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
12−14
medium / 1080p
8−9
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Battlefield 5 is 57% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
medium / 768p
80−85
85−90
ultra / 1080p
35−40
35−40
QHD / 1440p
24−27
−
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
high / 768p
60−65
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 5% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
65−70
70−75
medium / 768p
45−50
45−50
ultra / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000 in Dota 2 is 2% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
5−6
2−3
ultra / 1080p
5−6
2−3
4K / 2160p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
10−11
medium / 1080p
5−6
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
5−6
QHD / 1440p
−
1−2
low / 720p
45−50
45−50
medium / 1080p
12−14
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Fortnite is 15% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p
8−9
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
14−16
medium / 1080p
9−10
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Forza Horizon 4 is 37% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p
40−45
40−45
medium / 768p
35−40
−
high / 1080p
7−8
3−4
ultra / 1080p
5−6
2−3
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Grand Theft Auto V is 12% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p
3−4
1−2
ultra / 1080p
2−3
0−1
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
3−4
medium / 1080p
4−5
2−3
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Metro Exodus is 150% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p
85−90
85−90
high / 1080p
80−85
55−60
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p
16−18
14−16
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
24−27
24−27
medium / 1080p
16−18
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Quadro 2000.
ultra / 1080p
7−8
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 75% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p
16−18
8−9
medium / 768p
12−14
7−8
high / 1080p
6−7
3−4
ultra / 1080p
5−6
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p
80−85
70−75
medium / 768p
35−40
35−40
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
high / 768p
30−33
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in World of Tanks is 7% more, than Quadro 2000.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645
Quadro 2000
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake
Fermi
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
GF106
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
10 July 2019
24 December 2010
Pipelines
48
192
Core clock speed
300 MHz
625 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
Transistor count
1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
50.40
20.00
Floating-point performance
480.0 gflops
Length
178 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
2600 MHz
Memory bandwidth
41.6 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.103
N/A
CUDA
2.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
31 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
