Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Quadro 2000M

    When comparing Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro 2000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro 2000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
    Iris Plus Graphics 645 Check Price
    Quadro 2000M Check Price

    Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro 2000M are Laptop Graphics Cards

    Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro 2000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 or Quadro 2000M here:

    Iris Plus Graphics 645 Laptops
    Quadro 2000M Laptops

    Main Specs

      Iris Plus Graphics 645 Quadro 2000M
    Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 55 Watt
    Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 MXM-A (3.0)
    Memory type DDR3/DDR4 DDR3
    Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
      Check Price Check Price
    • Quadro 2000M has 266% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
    • Iris Plus Graphics 645 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro 2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
    • Iris Plus Graphics 645 is used in Laptops, and Quadro 2000M - in Mobile workstations.
    • Iris Plus Graphics 645 is build with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake architecture, and Quadro 2000M - with Fermi.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro 2000M is 250 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
    • Iris Plus Graphics 645 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000M - by 40 nm process technology.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 4−5 0−1
    ultra / 1080p 2−3 −
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
    low / 720p 12−14 1−2
    medium / 1080p 5−6 0−1
    The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Quadro 2000M.

    Full Specs

      Iris Plus Graphics 645 Quadro 2000M
    Architecture Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake Fermi
    Code name Kaby Lake GT3e Fermi
    Type Laptop Mobile workstation
    Release date 10 July 2019 22 February 2011
    Pipelines 48 192
    Core clock speed 300 MHz 550 MHz
    Boost Clock 1150 MHz
    Transistor count 1,170 million
    Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 40 nm
    Texture fill rate 50.40 17.60
    Floating-point performance 422.4 gflops
    Memory bus width 128 Bit
    Memory clock speed 900 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB/s
    Shared memory + -
    DirectX 12 (12_1) 12 (11_0)
    Shader Model 6.4 5.1
    OpenGL 4.6 4.6
    OpenCL 2.1 1.1
    Vulkan 1.1.103 N/A
    CUDA 2.1
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 27 Mh/s
    Laptop size medium sized
    Quick Sync +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares