Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Quadro 500M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro 500M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Plus Graphics 645 stacks up against Quadro 500M, check out specs charts below.
Quadro 500M
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Plus Graphics 645 | Quadro 500M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 500M has 133% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro 500M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 is used in Laptops, and Quadro 500M - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 is build with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake architecture, and Quadro 500M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro 500M is 400 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro 500M - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 500M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 153% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 500M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Dota 2 is 96% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Fortnite is 113% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | − |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Grand Theft Auto V is 121% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Minecraft is 60% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | − |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in World of Tanks is 100% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Plus Graphics 645 | Quadro 500M | |
| Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake | Fermi |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GF108 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 10 July 2019 | 22 February 2011 |
| Pipelines | 48 | 96 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 585 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 50.40 | 11.20 |
| Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.103 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |