Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Quadro FX 4800
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro FX 4800. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro FX 4800. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro FX 4800
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645 | Quadro FX 4800 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 900% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro FX 4800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 4800 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 is build with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake architecture, and Quadro FX 4800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro FX 4800 is 302 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 4800 - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Battlefield 5 is 37% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Dota 2 is 6% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Fortnite is 5% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Forza Horizon 4 is 10% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | − |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Minecraft is 2% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 16% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 66% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in World of Tanks is 7% more, than Quadro FX 4800. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645 | Quadro FX 4800 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 10 July 2019 | 11 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 48 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 602 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 50.40 | 38.53 |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | N/A |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon R9 M270X
- Quadro FX 4800 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon R9 M270X
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs GeForce 830M
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon E6760
- Quadro FX 4800 vs GeForce 830M
- Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon E6760