Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Quadro K1000M
When comparing Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro K1000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro K1000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro K1000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro K1000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 or Quadro K1000M here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645
Quadro K1000M
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
45 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
MXM-A (3.0)
Memory type
DDR3/DDR4
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K1000M has 200% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro K1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is used in Laptops, and Quadro K1000M - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is build with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake architecture, and Quadro K1000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K1000M is 550 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro K1000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
0−1
ultra / 1080p
2−3
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
1−2
medium / 1080p
5−6
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Quadro K1000M.
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
0−1
medium / 1080p
8−9
−
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
100−110
60−65
medium / 768p
80−85
27−30
ultra / 1080p
35−40
7−8
QHD / 1440p
24−27
−
high / 768p
60−65
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 153% more, than Quadro K1000M.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
12−14
0−1
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
65−70
45−50
medium / 768p
45−50
10−11
ultra / 1080p
21−24
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Dota 2 is 96% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
5−6
−
ultra / 1080p
5−6
−
4K / 2160p
3−4
−
low / 720p
12−14
0−1
medium / 1080p
5−6
−
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
−
low / 720p
45−50
21−24
medium / 1080p
12−14
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Fortnite is 113% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
8−9
0−1
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
0−1
medium / 1080p
9−10
0−1
low / 768p
40−45
18−20
medium / 768p
35−40
−
high / 1080p
7−8
0−1
ultra / 1080p
5−6
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Grand Theft Auto V is 121% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
3−4
−
ultra / 1080p
2−3
−
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
7−8
0−1
medium / 1080p
4−5
−
low / 768p
85−90
75−80
high / 1080p
80−85
27−30
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Minecraft is 60% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
low / 720p
24−27
8−9
medium / 1080p
16−18
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than Quadro K1000M.
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
7−8
0−1
low / 768p
16−18
0−1
medium / 768p
12−14
−
high / 1080p
6−7
−
ultra / 1080p
5−6
−
low / 768p
80−85
45−50
medium / 768p
35−40
14−16
ultra / 1080p
14−16
0−1
high / 768p
30−33
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in World of Tanks is 100% more, than Quadro K1000M.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645
Quadro K1000M
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake
Kepler
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
N14P-Q1
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
10 July 2019
1 June 2012
Pipelines
48
192
Core clock speed
300 MHz
850 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
50.40
13.60
Floating-point performance
326.4 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.103
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
10 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price