Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Quadro M520
In this comparison between Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro M520 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Plus Graphics 645 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M520 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro M520 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro M520 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 or Quadro M520 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645
Quadro M520
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
25 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
Memory type
DDR3/DDR4
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro M520 has 66% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is used in Laptops, and Quadro M520 - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is build with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake architecture, and Quadro M520 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M520 is 456 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro M520 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
9−10
ultra / 1080p
2−3
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
21−24
medium / 1080p
5−6
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
7−8
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
30−35
medium / 1080p
8−9
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Battlefield 5 is 81% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro M520 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
100−110
160−170
medium / 768p
80−85
130−140
ultra / 1080p
35−40
65−70
QHD / 1440p
24−27
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
high / 768p
60−65
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 64% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
12−14
24−27
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
65−70
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
70−75
ultra / 1080p
21−24
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Dota 2 is 55% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
5−6
10−12
ultra / 1080p
5−6
10−11
4K / 2160p
3−4
4−5
low / 720p
12−14
24−27
medium / 1080p
5−6
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
12−14
18−20
ultra / 1080p
8−9
12−14
low / 720p
45−50
70−75
medium / 1080p
12−14
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Fortnite is 70% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
8−9
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
16−18
35−40
medium / 1080p
9−10
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 118% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
40−45
60−65
medium / 768p
35−40
55−60
high / 1080p
7−8
18−20
ultra / 1080p
5−6
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 56% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
3−4
6−7
ultra / 1080p
2−3
4−5
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
7−8
18−20
medium / 1080p
4−5
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
85−90
100−110
high / 1080p
80−85
−
ultra / 1080p
70−75
90−95
medium / 1080p
−
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Minecraft is 22% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
16−18
18−20
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
40−45
medium / 1080p
16−18
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 33% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
16−18
medium / 1080p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 71% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
16−18
35−40
medium / 768p
12−14
21−24
high / 1080p
6−7
12−14
ultra / 1080p
5−6
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
80−85
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
50−55
ultra / 1080p
14−16
24−27
high / 768p
30−33
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645
Quadro M520
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake
Maxwell
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
10 July 2019
13 January 2017
Pipelines
48
384
Core clock speed
300 MHz
756 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
1019 MHz
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
50.40
Memory bus width
64 Bit
Memory bandwidth
40 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12
Shader Model
6.4
5.0
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
2.1
Vulkan
1.1.103
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
nView Display Management
+
3D Stereo
+
Check Price
Check Price
