Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon HD 4810
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Radeon HD 4810, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Plus Graphics 645 stacks up against Radeon HD 4810, check out specs charts below.
Radeon HD 4810
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645 | Radeon HD 4810 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 95 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4810 has 533% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon HD 4810 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 4810 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 is build with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake architecture, and Radeon HD 4810 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 4810 is 325 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4810 - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4810 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 153% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4810 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Dota 2 is 96% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Fortnite is 113% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | − |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Grand Theft Auto V is 121% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Minecraft is 60% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | − |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
low / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in World of Tanks is 100% more, than Radeon HD 4810. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645 | Radeon HD 4810 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake | TeraScale |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | RV770 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 10 July 2019 | 28 May 2009 |
Pipelines | 48 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 625 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 50.40 | 20.00 |
Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops | |
Length | 246 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | N/A |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon R9 M270X
- Radeon HD 4810 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- Radeon HD 4810 vs Radeon R9 M270X
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs GeForce 920M
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs GeForce 9800 GTX
- Radeon HD 4810 vs GeForce 920M
- Radeon HD 4810 vs GeForce 9800 GTX