Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon Pro 560
When comparing Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Radeon Pro 560, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Radeon Pro 560 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Radeon Pro 560 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Radeon Pro 560 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 or Radeon Pro 560 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645
Radeon Pro 560
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3/DDR4
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon Pro 560 has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon Pro 560 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro 560 - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is build with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake architecture, and Radeon Pro 560 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 560 is 607 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Radeon Pro 560 are manufactured by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
16−18
ultra / 1080p
2−3
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
5−6
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 250% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
7−8
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
16−18
60−65
medium / 1080p
8−9
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Battlefield 5 is 263% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
100−110
220−230
medium / 768p
80−85
190−200
ultra / 1080p
35−40
100−110
QHD / 1440p
24−27
70−75
4K / 2160p
−
35−40
high / 768p
60−65
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 141% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 41% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
65−70
110−120
medium / 768p
45−50
100−110
ultra / 1080p
21−24
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Dota 2 is 115% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
5−6
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
3−4
6−7
low / 720p
12−14
45−50
medium / 1080p
5−6
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
8−9
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
45−50
110−120
medium / 1080p
12−14
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Fortnite is 185% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
8−9
30−33
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−12
low / 720p
16−18
60−65
medium / 1080p
9−10
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Forza Horizon 4 is 281% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
40−45
95−100
medium / 768p
35−40
85−90
high / 1080p
7−8
35−40
ultra / 1080p
5−6
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Grand Theft Auto V is 156% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
3−4
10−12
ultra / 1080p
2−3
9−10
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
7−8
35−40
medium / 1080p
4−5
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
80−85
−
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
65−70
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 73% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
16−18
65−70
medium / 768p
12−14
40−45
high / 1080p
6−7
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 260% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
80−85
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
35−40
high / 768p
30−33
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in World of Tanks is 51% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645
Radeon Pro 560
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake
Polaris
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
Polaris 21
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
10 July 2019
5 June 2017
Pipelines
48
1024
Core clock speed
300 MHz
907 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
Transistor count
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
50.40
58.05
Floating-point performance
1,858 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5080 MHz
Memory bandwidth
81.28 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
6.4
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.103
1.2.131
FreeSync
+
Laptop size
large
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price