Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon Pro W5500M
When comparing Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Radeon Pro W5500M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Radeon Pro W5500M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon Pro W5500M
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645 | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 85 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro W5500M has 466% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon Pro W5500M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro W5500M - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 is build with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake architecture, and Radeon Pro W5500M - with RDNA 1.0.
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro W5500M - by 7 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Radeon Pro W5500M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 114% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Dota 2 is 91% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Far Cry 5 is 216% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Fortnite is 140% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Forza Horizon 4 is 218% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Grand Theft Auto V is 113% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Metro Exodus is 250% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Minecraft is 37% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 171% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645 | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake | RDNA 1.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Navi 14 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 10 July 2019 | 10 February 2020 |
Pipelines | 48 | 1408 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | 1450 MHz |
Transistor count | 6,400 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 50.40 | 127.6 |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | 1.2.131 |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon R9 M270X
- Radeon Pro W5500M vs Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- Radeon Pro W5500M vs Radeon R9 M270X
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs GeForce GT 1030
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon RX 540
- Radeon Pro W5500M vs GeForce GT 1030
- Radeon Pro W5500M vs Radeon RX 540