Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon R7 A360
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Radeon R7 A360, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Plus Graphics 645 stacks up against Radeon R7 A360, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R7 A360
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645 | Radeon R7 A360 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon R7 A360 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 A360 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 is build with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake architecture, and Radeon R7 A360 - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 A360 is 425 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 A360 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A360 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 153% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A360 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Dota 2 is 96% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Fortnite is 113% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | − |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Grand Theft Auto V is 121% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Minecraft is 60% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | − |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
low / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in World of Tanks is 100% more, than Radeon R7 A360. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645 | Radeon R7 A360 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Meso |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 10 July 2019 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 48 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | 980 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,550 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 50.40 | 23.52 |
Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3.6 GB/s | |
Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | 1.2 |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon R9 M270X
- Radeon R7 A360 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- Radeon R7 A360 vs Radeon R9 M270X
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs GeForce 720A
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon HD 6550A
- Radeon R7 A360 vs GeForce 720A
- Radeon R7 A360 vs Radeon HD 6550A