Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon R9 M290X
In this comparison between Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Radeon R9 M290X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Plus Graphics 645 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M290X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Radeon R9 M290X are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Radeon R9 M290X are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 or Radeon R9 M290X here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645
Radeon R9 M290X
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
100 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3/DDR4
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon R9 M290X has 566% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon R9 M290X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is build with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake architecture, and Radeon R9 M290X - with GCN.
Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M290X is 550 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M290X - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
16−18
ultra / 1080p
2−3
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
12−14
30−35
medium / 1080p
5−6
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
7−8
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
9−10
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
16−18
55−60
medium / 1080p
8−9
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Battlefield 5 is 227% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Radeon R9 M290X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
100−110
210−220
medium / 768p
80−85
180−190
ultra / 1080p
35−40
100−110
QHD / 1440p
24−27
55−60
4K / 2160p
−
30−35
high / 768p
60−65
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 130% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
12−14
40−45
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
65−70
110−120
medium / 768p
45−50
95−100
ultra / 1080p
21−24
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Dota 2 is 106% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
5−6
18−20
ultra / 1080p
5−6
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
3−4
6−7
low / 720p
12−14
40−45
medium / 1080p
5−6
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
8−9
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
45−50
100−110
medium / 1080p
12−14
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Fortnite is 165% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
8−9
27−30
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
16−18
55−60
medium / 1080p
9−10
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Forza Horizon 4 is 254% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
40−45
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
80−85
high / 1080p
7−8
30−35
ultra / 1080p
5−6
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Grand Theft Auto V is 139% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
3−4
10−11
ultra / 1080p
2−3
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
7−8
30−35
medium / 1080p
4−5
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
80−85
−
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
medium / 1080p
−
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Minecraft is 32% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
16−18
24−27
ultra / 1080p
14−16
18−20
low / 720p
24−27
60−65
medium / 1080p
16−18
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
16−18
60−65
medium / 768p
12−14
35−40
high / 1080p
6−7
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 230% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
80−85
100−110
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
35−40
high / 768p
30−33
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in World of Tanks is 58% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645
Radeon R9 M290X
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake
GCN
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
Neptune
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
10 July 2019
7 January 2014
Pipelines
48
1280
Core clock speed
300 MHz
850 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
900 MHz
Transistor count
2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
50.40
72.00
Floating-point performance
2,304 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth
153.6 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.4
OpenCL
2.1
Not Listed
Vulkan
1.1.103
FreeSync
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
300 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Eyefinity
+
HD3D
+
PowerTune
+
DualGraphics
+
ZeroCore
+
Switchable graphics
+
Mantle
+
Quick Sync
+
Compute units
20
Check Price
Check Price