FirePro M4150 vs Iris Plus Graphics 650
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M4150 and Iris Plus Graphics 650. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M4150 and Iris Plus Graphics 650. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro M4150
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4150 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 32 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 31 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - in Laptops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 415 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- FirePro M4150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Battlefield 5 is 111% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro M4150 and Iris Plus Graphics 650 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 38% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Dota 2 is 35% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Far Cry 5 is 175% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Fortnite is 63% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Forza Horizon 4 is 77% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Grand Theft Auto V is 61% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Minecraft is 12% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in World of Tanks is 30% more, than FirePro M4150. |
Full Specs
FirePro M4150 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
Code name | Opal | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 16 October 2013 | 3 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 950 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 55.20 |
Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 883 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.103 |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |