FirePro M7740 vs Iris Plus Graphics 650
In this comparison between FirePro M7740 and Iris Plus Graphics 650 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M7740 will be the best choice, for others Iris Plus Graphics 650 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro M7740 and Iris Plus Graphics 650 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: FirePro M7740 and Iris Plus Graphics 650 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M7740 or Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M7740
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Power consumption (TDP)
60 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
32 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro M7740 has 300% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
FirePro M7740 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 31 GB more memory, than FirePro M7740.
FirePro M7740 is used in Mobile workstations, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - in Laptops.
FirePro M7740 is build with Terascale 1 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
Core clock speed of FirePro M7740 is 350 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
FirePro M7740 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
8−9
ultra / 1080p
4−5
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
18−20
medium / 1080p
8−9
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 11% more, than FirePro M7740.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−11
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
30−33
medium / 1080p
12−14
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Battlefield 5 is 20% more, than FirePro M7740.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro M7740 and Iris Plus Graphics 650 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
130−140
150−160
medium / 768p
110−120
120−130
ultra / 1080p
50−55
60−65
QHD / 1440p
27−30
35−40
4K / 2160p
27−30
27−30
high / 768p
80−85
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than FirePro M7740.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than FirePro M7740.
low / 768p
80−85
85−90
medium / 768p
55−60
65−70
ultra / 1080p
30−35
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Dota 2 is 14% more, than FirePro M7740.
high / 1080p
8−9
10−11
ultra / 1080p
7−8
9−10
4K / 2160p
3−4
4−5
low / 720p
18−20
21−24
medium / 1080p
8−9
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Far Cry 5 is 22% more, than FirePro M7740.
high / 1080p
14−16
16−18
ultra / 1080p
10−11
12−14
low / 720p
60−65
65−70
medium / 1080p
21−24
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Fortnite is 14% more, than FirePro M7740.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−12
12−14
QHD / 1440p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
24−27
30−35
medium / 1080p
14−16
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Forza Horizon 4 is 23% more, than FirePro M7740.
low / 768p
50−55
60−65
medium / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
12−14
16−18
ultra / 1080p
6−7
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Grand Theft Auto V is 17% more, than FirePro M7740.
high / 1080p
4−5
5−6
ultra / 1080p
3−4
4−5
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
12−14
14−16
medium / 1080p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than FirePro M7740.
low / 768p
95−100
95−100
high / 1080p
85−90
90−95
ultra / 1080p
80−85
85−90
medium / 1080p
90−95
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Minecraft is 3% more, than FirePro M7740.
high / 1080p
16−18
18−20
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than FirePro M7740.
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
14−16
medium / 1080p
10−12
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than FirePro M7740.
low / 768p
24−27
30−35
medium / 768p
16−18
20−22
high / 1080p
9−10
10−12
ultra / 1080p
6−7
7−8
4K / 2160p
6−7
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 15% more, than FirePro M7740.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
45−50
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
high / 768p
35−40
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than FirePro M7740.
Full Specs
FirePro M7740
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Architecture
Terascale 1
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Code name
RV740
Kaby Lake GT3e
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
4 August 2009
3 January 2017
Pipelines
640
48
Core clock speed
650 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
Transistor count
826 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
20.80
55.20
Floating-point performance
832.0 gflops
883 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
54.14 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
4.1
6.4
OpenGL
3.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.1
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.103
Laptop size
large
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
