FirePro S7000 vs Iris Plus Graphics 650
In this comparison between FirePro S7000 and Iris Plus Graphics 650 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S7000 will be the best choice, for others Iris Plus Graphics 650 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S7000
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7000 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 32 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 2233% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 28 GB more memory, than FirePro S7000.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 650 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- FirePro S7000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 160% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 133% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 78% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 35% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 64% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 163% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 109% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 143% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 94% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 23% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 52% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 108% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 133% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7000 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
Code name | Pitcairn | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 27 August 2012 | 3 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 55.20 |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 883 gflops |
Length | 292 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.103 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro S7000 vs Radeon R9 270
- FirePro S7000 vs GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Radeon R9 270
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
- FirePro S7000 vs Radeon R9 M385X
- FirePro S7000 vs GeForce GTX 650
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Radeon R9 M385X
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs GeForce GTX 650