FirePro S7150 vs Iris Plus Graphics 650
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro S7150 and Iris Plus Graphics 650, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro S7150 stacks up against Iris Plus Graphics 650, check out specs charts below.
FirePro S7150
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S7150 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 32 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S7150 has 900% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- FirePro S7150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 24 GB more memory, than FirePro S7150.
- FirePro S7150 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7150 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 620 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- FirePro S7150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Battlefield 5 is 277% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 113% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Far Cry 5 is 327% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Fortnite is 229% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 293% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 173% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Metro Exodus is 416% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Minecraft is 34% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 233% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 30−35 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 20−22 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 313% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in World of Tanks is 31% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S7150 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
| Code name | Tonga | Kaby Lake GT3e |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 February 2016 | 3 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 117.8 | 55.20 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | 883 gflops |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.103 |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |