FirePro V5800 vs Iris Plus Graphics 650
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro V5800 and Iris Plus Graphics 650, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro V5800 stacks up against Iris Plus Graphics 650, check out specs charts below.
FirePro V5800
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 32 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro V5800 has 393% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 31 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 390 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 25% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Battlefield 5 is 38% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro V5800 and Iris Plus Graphics 650 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Far Cry 5 is 22% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Fortnite is 19% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Grand Theft Auto V is 21% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Minecraft is 5% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 38% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
| Code name | Juniper | Kaby Lake GT3e |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 26 April 2010 | 3 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 55.20 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 883 gflops |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.103 |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |