FirePro W7170M vs Iris Plus Graphics 650
In this comparison between FirePro W7170M and Iris Plus Graphics 650 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W7170M will be the best choice, for others Iris Plus Graphics 650 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W7170M and Iris Plus Graphics 650 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: FirePro W7170M and Iris Plus Graphics 650 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W7170M or Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
FirePro W7170M
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
32 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro W7170M has 566% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
FirePro W7170M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 28 GB more memory, than FirePro W7170M.
FirePro W7170M is used in Mobile workstations, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - in Laptops.
FirePro W7170M is build with GCN 3 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
Core clock speed of FirePro W7170M is 423 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
FirePro W7170M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
20−22
8−9
ultra / 1080p
12−14
5−6
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
35−40
18−20
medium / 1080p
24−27
10−11
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
30−35
14−16
ultra / 1080p
27−30
12−14
QHD / 1440p
10−12
0−1
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
65−70
30−33
medium / 1080p
35−40
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Battlefield 5 is 127% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
230−240
150−160
medium / 768p
200−210
120−130
ultra / 1080p
110−120
60−65
QHD / 1440p
85−90
35−40
4K / 2160p
45−50
27−30
high / 768p
160−170
90−95
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 71% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
50−55
21−24
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 35% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
120−130
85−90
medium / 768p
100−110
65−70
ultra / 1080p
75−80
40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Dota 2 is 56% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
24−27
10−11
ultra / 1080p
21−24
9−10
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
7−8
4−5
low / 720p
50−55
21−24
medium / 1080p
24−27
10−11
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Far Cry 5 is 136% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
30−35
16−18
ultra / 1080p
24−27
12−14
QHD / 1440p
14−16
−
low / 720p
120−130
65−70
medium / 1080p
70−75
27−30
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Fortnite is 103% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
30−35
14−16
ultra / 1080p
24−27
12−14
QHD / 1440p
12−14
2−3
4K / 2160p
12−14
−
low / 720p
65−70
30−35
medium / 1080p
35−40
16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Forza Horizon 4 is 118% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
100−110
60−65
medium / 768p
90−95
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
16−18
ultra / 1080p
16−18
7−8
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Grand Theft Auto V is 88% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
12−14
5−6
ultra / 1080p
10−11
4−5
4K / 2160p
2−3
1−2
low / 720p
35−40
14−16
medium / 1080p
16−18
7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
120−130
95−100
high / 1080p
−
90−95
ultra / 1080p
−
85−90
medium / 1080p
110−120
95−100
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Minecraft is 23% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
70−75
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 52% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
8−9
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
35−40
14−16
medium / 1080p
20−22
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 91% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
70−75
30−35
medium / 768p
45−50
20−22
high / 1080p
24−27
10−12
ultra / 1080p
14−16
7−8
4K / 2160p
8−9
6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 120% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
45−50
ultra / 1080p
40−45
21−24
high / 768p
55−60
40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in World of Tanks is 23% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
Full Specs
FirePro W7170M
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Architecture
GCN 3
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Code name
Tonga
Kaby Lake GT3e
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
2 October 2015
3 January 2017
Pipelines
2048
48
Core clock speed
723 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
Transistor count
5,000 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
92.54
55.20
Floating-point performance
2,961 gflops
883 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
6.3
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
2.1
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.1.103
Laptop size
large
Eyefinity
+
Quick Sync
+
AppAcceleration
+
Check Price
Check Price