FireStream 9270 vs Iris Plus Graphics 650
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FireStream 9270 and Iris Plus Graphics 650, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FireStream 9270 stacks up against Iris Plus Graphics 650, check out specs charts below.
FireStream 9270
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 32 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 966% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 30 GB more memory, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 450 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 42% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Battlefield 5 is 38% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 22% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Dota 2 is 14% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Far Cry 5 is 37% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Fortnite is 32% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Forza Horizon 4 is 40% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Metro Exodus is 60% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Minecraft is 5% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 40% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 50% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in World of Tanks is 21% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
| Code name | RV770 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 13 November 2008 | 3 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 55.20 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 883 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.103 |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |