FireStream 9370 vs Iris Plus Graphics 650
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FireStream 9370 and Iris Plus Graphics 650, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FireStream 9370 stacks up against Iris Plus Graphics 650, check out specs charts below.
FireStream 9370
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 32 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 28 GB more memory, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 525 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9370 and Iris Plus Graphics 650 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 30% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 27% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 54% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 38% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 32% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 46% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 17% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
Code name | Cypress | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 3 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 55.20 |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 883 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.103 |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- FireStream 9370 vs Radeon R9 M385X
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 650
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Radeon R9 M385X
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs GeForce GTX 650