GeForce 820A vs Iris Plus Graphics 650
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce 820A and Iris Plus Graphics 650. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce 820A and Iris Plus Graphics 650. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce 820A
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 820A | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 32 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 15 Watt.
- GeForce 820A is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 31 GB more memory, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - in Laptops.
- GeForce 820A is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 820A is 475 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- GeForce 820A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 285% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Dota 2 is 165% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Fortnite is 204% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Grand Theft Auto V is 226% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Minecraft is 79% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| medium / 768p | − | 20−22 |
| high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in World of Tanks is 140% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 820A | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
| Code name | GF117 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 3 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 96 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 12.40 | 55.20 |
| Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 883 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.103 |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |