GeForce 840M vs Iris Plus Graphics 650
In this comparison between GeForce 840M and Iris Plus Graphics 650 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 840M will be the best choice, for others Iris Plus Graphics 650 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 840M and Iris Plus Graphics 650 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce 840M and Iris Plus Graphics 650 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 840M or Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
GeForce 840M
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Power consumption (TDP)
33 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
PCIe 3.0 x1
Memory type
DDR3
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
32 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce 840M has 120% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
GeForce 840M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 28 GB more memory, than GeForce 840M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce 840M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
Core clock speed of GeForce 840M is 729 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
GeForce 840M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
1−2
8−9
ultra / 1080p
0−1
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
18−20
medium / 1080p
3−4
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce 840M.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
4−5
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
30−33
medium / 1080p
5−6
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Battlefield 5 is 111% more, than GeForce 840M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce 840M.
low / 768p
120−130
150−160
medium / 768p
90−95
120−130
ultra / 1080p
40−45
60−65
QHD / 1440p
24−27
35−40
4K / 2160p
18−20
27−30
high / 768p
65−70
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 33% more, than GeForce 840M.
low / 768p
85−90
55−60
ultra / 1080p
16−18
21−24
medium / 1080p
40−45
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 840M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
75−80
85−90
medium / 768p
50−55
65−70
ultra / 1080p
24−27
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Dota 2 is 27% more, than GeForce 840M.
high / 1080p
2−3
10−11
ultra / 1080p
2−3
9−10
4K / 2160p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
12−14
21−24
medium / 1080p
3−4
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Far Cry 5 is 160% more, than GeForce 840M.
high / 1080p
10−11
16−18
ultra / 1080p
5−6
12−14
QHD / 1440p
2−3
−
low / 720p
50−55
65−70
medium / 1080p
10−12
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Fortnite is 63% more, than GeForce 840M.
high / 1080p
4−5
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
16−18
30−35
medium / 1080p
7−8
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than GeForce 840M.
low / 768p
45−50
60−65
medium / 768p
−
50−55
high / 1080p
5−6
16−18
ultra / 1080p
2−3
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Grand Theft Auto V is 61% more, than GeForce 840M.
high / 1080p
1−2
5−6
ultra / 1080p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
5−6
14−16
medium / 1080p
3−4
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than GeForce 840M.
low / 768p
90−95
95−100
high / 1080p
85−90
90−95
ultra / 1080p
70−75
85−90
medium / 1080p
90−95
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce 840M.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
35−40
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than GeForce 840M.
ultra / 1080p
4−5
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
14−16
medium / 1080p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 120% more, than GeForce 840M.
low / 768p
12−14
30−35
medium / 768p
9−10
20−22
high / 1080p
4−5
10−12
ultra / 1080p
3−4
7−8
4K / 2160p
0−1
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 157% more, than GeForce 840M.
low / 768p
75−80
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
45−50
ultra / 1080p
16−18
21−24
high / 768p
30−35
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in World of Tanks is 24% more, than GeForce 840M.
Full Specs
GeForce 840M
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Architecture
Maxwell
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Code name
N15S-GT
Kaby Lake GT3e
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
12 March 2014
3 January 2017
Pipelines
384
48
Core clock speed
1029 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1100 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
17.98
55.20
Floating-point performance
863.2 gflops
883 gflops
Memory bus width
64 Bit
64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed
2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
16.02 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.103
CUDA
+
Bus support
PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
92 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
GPU Boost
2.0
GameWorks
+
Check Price
Check Price
