GeForce 940A vs Iris Plus Graphics 650
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce 940A and Iris Plus Graphics 650, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce 940A stacks up against Iris Plus Graphics 650, check out specs charts below.
GeForce 940A
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
GeForce 940A | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 32 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce 940A has 120% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- GeForce 940A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 31 GB more memory, than GeForce 940A.
- GeForce 940A is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - in Laptops.
- GeForce 940A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 940A is 729 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- GeForce 940A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Battlefield 5 is 72% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 17% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 33% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Dota 2 is 25% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Far Cry 5 is 71% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Fortnite is 40% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Forza Horizon 4 is 75% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Grand Theft Auto V is 52% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 37% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in World of Tanks is 30% more, than GeForce 940A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 940A | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
Code name | GM108 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 3 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 | 55.20 |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 883 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.103 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |