GeForce 9800 GTX vs Iris Plus Graphics 650
In this comparison between GeForce 9800 GTX and Iris Plus Graphics 650 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 9800 GTX will be the best choice, for others Iris Plus Graphics 650 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 9800 GTX
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
GeForce 9800 GTX | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 32 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce 9800 GTX has 833% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- GeForce 9800 GTX has 480 GB more memory, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - in Laptops.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is build with Tesla architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 9800 GTX is 1388 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800 GTX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 285% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800 GTX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Dota 2 is 165% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Fortnite is 204% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Grand Theft Auto V is 226% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Minecraft is 79% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | − | 20−22 |
high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in World of Tanks is 140% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. |
Full Specs
GeForce 9800 GTX | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
Architecture | Tesla | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
Code name | G92 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 28 March 2008 | 3 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 128 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 1688 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 754 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.2 billion/sec | 55.20 |
Floating-point performance | 432.1 gflops | 883 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 70.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.103 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 128 | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | Via Adapter | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce 9800 GTX vs Radeon HD 4810
- GeForce 9800 GTX vs Radeon R8 M365DX
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Radeon HD 4810
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Radeon R8 M365DX
- GeForce 9800 GTX vs Radeon R9 M385X
- GeForce 9800 GTX vs GeForce GTX 650
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Radeon R9 M385X
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs GeForce GTX 650