GeForce GTX 295 vs Iris Plus Graphics 650
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and Iris Plus Graphics 650, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 295 stacks up against Iris Plus Graphics 650, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 295
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 32 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1826% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1760 GB more memory, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 942 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Battlefield 5 is 72% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Dota 2 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Far Cry 5 is 71% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Fortnite is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Forza Horizon 4 is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Grand Theft Auto V is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in World of Tanks is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
Code name | GT200B | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 8 January 2009 | 3 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 240 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 55.20 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | 883 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.103 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Quick Sync | + | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M275
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Radeon R9 M275
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M385X
- GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GTX 650
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Radeon R9 M385X
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs GeForce GTX 650