GeForce GTX 485M vs Iris Plus Graphics 650
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 485M and Iris Plus Graphics 650, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 485M stacks up against Iris Plus Graphics 650, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 485M and Iris Plus Graphics 650 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 485M and Iris Plus Graphics 650 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 485M or Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 485M
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
32 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 485M has 566% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
GeForce GTX 485M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Iris Plus Graphics 650 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 30 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 485M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 485M is build with Fermi architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 485M is 84 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
GeForce GTX 485M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
12−14
8−9
ultra / 1080p
7−8
5−6
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
18−20
medium / 1080p
14−16
10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
18−20
14−16
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
40−45
30−33
medium / 1080p
21−24
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Battlefield 5 is 38% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 485M and Iris Plus Graphics 650 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
180−190
150−160
medium / 768p
150−160
120−130
ultra / 1080p
80−85
60−65
QHD / 1440p
45−50
35−40
4K / 2160p
30−33
27−30
high / 768p
120−130
90−95
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 25% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
30−35
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
100−110
85−90
medium / 768p
80−85
65−70
ultra / 1080p
50−55
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Dota 2 is 23% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
14−16
10−11
ultra / 1080p
12−14
9−10
4K / 2160p
5−6
4−5
low / 720p
30−35
21−24
medium / 1080p
14−16
10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Far Cry 5 is 45% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
21−24
16−18
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
low / 720p
85−90
65−70
medium / 1080p
40−45
27−30
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Fortnite is 35% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
21−24
14−16
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
QHD / 1440p
6−7
2−3
low / 720p
40−45
30−35
medium / 1080p
21−24
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Forza Horizon 4 is 37% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
medium / 768p
65−70
50−55
high / 1080p
21−24
16−18
ultra / 1080p
10−11
7−8
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
8−9
5−6
ultra / 1080p
6−7
4−5
4K / 2160p
2−3
1−2
low / 720p
21−24
14−16
medium / 1080p
10−11
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
100−110
95−100
high / 1080p
−
90−95
ultra / 1080p
95−100
85−90
medium / 1080p
100−110
95−100
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Minecraft is 8% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
20−22
18−20
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
45−50
35−40
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
14−16
medium / 1080p
14−16
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
40−45
30−35
medium / 768p
27−30
20−22
high / 1080p
14−16
10−12
ultra / 1080p
9−10
7−8
4K / 2160p
7−8
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 33% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
95−100
90−95
medium / 768p
55−60
45−50
ultra / 1080p
30−33
21−24
high / 768p
45−50
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in World of Tanks is 13% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 485M
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Architecture
Fermi
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Code name
N12E-GTX-A1
Kaby Lake GT3e
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
6 January 2010
3 January 2017
Pipelines
384
48
Core clock speed
384
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
Transistor count
1,950 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
36.8 billion/sec
55.20
Floating-point performance
883.2 gflops
883 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth
96.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.1
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.103
CUDA
+
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
SLI options
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Laptop size
large
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price