GeForce GTX 560 SE vs Iris Plus Graphics 650
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 560 SE and Iris Plus Graphics 650 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 560 SE will be the best choice, for others Iris Plus Graphics 650 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 560 SE
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Power consumption (TDP)
150 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
32 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 560 SE has 900% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
GeForce GTX 560 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 31 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
GeForce GTX 560 SE is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 560 SE is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 560 SE is 436 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
GeForce GTX 560 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
9−10
8−9
ultra / 1080p
5−6
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
18−20
medium / 1080p
10−12
10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
14−16
14−16
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
30−33
medium / 1080p
16−18
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 SE in Battlefield 5 is 5% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 560 SE and Iris Plus Graphics 650 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
160−170
150−160
medium / 768p
130−140
120−130
ultra / 1080p
65−70
60−65
QHD / 1440p
35−40
35−40
4K / 2160p
27−30
27−30
high / 768p
100−105
90−95
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 7% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
24−27
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 SE in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
medium / 768p
70−75
65−70
ultra / 1080p
40−45
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 SE in Dota 2 is 6% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
10−12
10−11
ultra / 1080p
10−11
9−10
4K / 2160p
4−5
4−5
low / 720p
24−27
21−24
medium / 1080p
10−12
10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 SE in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
16−18
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
low / 720p
70−75
65−70
medium / 1080p
30−35
27−30
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 SE in Fortnite is 6% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
16−18
14−16
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
QHD / 1440p
3−4
2−3
low / 720p
30−35
30−35
medium / 1080p
18−20
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 6% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
medium / 768p
55−60
50−55
high / 1080p
16−18
16−18
ultra / 1080p
8−9
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
6−7
5−6
ultra / 1080p
4−5
4−5
4K / 2160p
1−2
1−2
low / 720p
16−18
14−16
medium / 1080p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 SE in Metro Exodus is 16% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
100−105
95−100
high / 1080p
95−100
90−95
ultra / 1080p
85−90
85−90
medium / 1080p
95−100
95−100
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 SE in Minecraft is 3% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
18−20
18−20
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
40−45
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 4% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
14−16
medium / 1080p
12−14
12−14
GeForce GTX 560 SE and Iris Plus Graphics 650 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2.
low / 768p
30−35
30−35
medium / 768p
21−24
20−22
high / 1080p
12−14
10−12
ultra / 1080p
7−8
7−8
4K / 2160p
6−7
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 6% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
45−50
ultra / 1080p
24−27
21−24
high / 768p
40−45
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 SE in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 560 SE
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Code name
GF114
Kaby Lake GT3e
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
20 February 2012
3 January 2017
Pipelines
288
48
Core clock speed
736 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
Transistor count
1,950 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
35.33
55.20
Floating-point performance
847.9 gflops
883 gflops
Length
210 mm
Memory bus width
192 Bit
64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed
3828 MHz
Memory bandwidth
91.87 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.1
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.103
CUDA
2.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
54 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
