GRID K140Q vs Iris Plus Graphics 650
When comparing GRID K140Q and Iris Plus Graphics 650, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K140Q and Iris Plus Graphics 650 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K140Q
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K140Q | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 32 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K140Q has 766% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- GRID K140Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 31 GB more memory, than GRID K140Q.
- GRID K140Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - in Laptops.
- GRID K140Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of GRID K140Q is 550 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- GRID K140Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 180% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Battlefield 5 is 375% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 67% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Dota 2 is 66% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Fortnite is 118% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Forza Horizon 4 is 242% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Grand Theft Auto V is 67% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Minecraft is 35% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1400% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| medium / 768p | − | 20−22 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 950% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in World of Tanks is 50% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K140Q | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
| Code name | GK107 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 3 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 55.20 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 883 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.103 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |