GRID K520 vs Iris Plus Graphics 650
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K520 and Iris Plus Graphics 650. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K520 and Iris Plus Graphics 650. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K520
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
GRID K520 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 32 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- GRID K520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 28 GB more memory, than GRID K520.
- GRID K520 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - in Laptops.
- GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of GRID K520 is 445 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- GRID K520 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 83% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K520 and Iris Plus Graphics 650 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 48% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 43% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 90% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 70% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 87% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 61% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 133% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 86% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 27% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. |
Full Specs
GRID K520 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
Code name | GK104 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 23 July 2013 | 3 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 55.20 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | 883 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.103 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |