Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs P106 090
When choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 650 and P106 090, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Plus Graphics 650 and P106 090.
P106 090
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650 | P106 090 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- P106 090 has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and P106 090 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 29 GB more memory, than P106 090.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is used in Laptops, and P106 090 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and P106 090 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of P106 090 is 1054 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and P106 090 - by 16 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 90% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Battlefield 5 is 72% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Plus Graphics 650 and P106 090 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 90−95 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 40% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Far Cry 5 is 72% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Fortnite is 54% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Forza Horizon 4 is 68% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Grand Theft Auto V is 50% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Minecraft is 14% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 36% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 60% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in World of Tanks is 25% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650 | P106 090 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | Pascal |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GP106 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 3 January 2017 | 31 July 2017 |
Pipelines | 48 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1354 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 1531 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 4,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Texture fill rate | 55.20 | 73.49 |
Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | 2,352 gflops |
Length | 250 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 6.1 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |