Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Quadro 2000D
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro 2000D. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro 2000D. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro 2000D
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Plus Graphics 650 | Quadro 2000D | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 62 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 2000D has 313% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro 2000D uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 31 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is used in Laptops, and Quadro 2000D - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro 2000D - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 325 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000D - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Battlefield 5 is 111% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro 2000D have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 150−160 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 38% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Dota 2 is 35% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Far Cry 5 is 175% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Fortnite is 63% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Forza Horizon 4 is 77% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Grand Theft Auto V is 61% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Minecraft is 12% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in World of Tanks is 30% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Plus Graphics 650 | Quadro 2000D | |
| Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | Fermi |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GF106 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 3 January 2017 | 5 October 2011 |
| Pipelines | 48 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,170 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 55.20 | 20.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
| Length | 178 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.103 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |