Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Quadro 4000M

    If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro 4000M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Plus Graphics 650 stacks up against Quadro 4000M, check out specs charts below.
    Iris Plus Graphics 650 Check Price
    Quadro 4000M Check Price

    Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro 4000M are Laptop Graphics Cards

    Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro 4000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 or Quadro 4000M here:

    Iris Plus Graphics 650 Laptops
    Quadro 4000M Laptops

    Main Specs

      Iris Plus Graphics 650 Quadro 4000M
    Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 100 Watt
    Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 MXM-B (3.0)
    Memory type DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 2 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
      Check Price Check Price
    • Quadro 4000M has 566% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
    • Iris Plus Graphics 650 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro 4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
    • Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 30 GB more memory, than Quadro 4000M.
    • Iris Plus Graphics 650 is used in Laptops, and Quadro 4000M - in Mobile workstations.
    • Iris Plus Graphics 650 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro 4000M - with Fermi.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro 4000M is 175 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
    • Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro 4000M - by 40 nm process technology.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 8−9 3−4
    ultra / 1080p 5−6 1−2
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
    low / 720p 18−20 14−16
    medium / 1080p 10−11 5−6
    The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Quadro 4000M.

    Full Specs

      Iris Plus Graphics 650 Quadro 4000M
    Architecture Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake Fermi
    Code name Kaby Lake GT3e Fermi
    Type Laptop Mobile workstation
    Release date 3 January 2017 22 February 2011
    Pipelines 48 336
    Core clock speed 300 MHz 475 MHz
    Boost Clock 1100 MHz
    Transistor count 189 million 1,950 million
    Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 40 nm
    Texture fill rate 55.20 26.60
    Floating-point performance 883 gflops 638.4 gflops
    Memory bus width 64/128 Bit 256 Bit
    Memory clock speed 1200 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 80 GB/s
    Shared memory + -
    DirectX 12 (12_1) 12 (11_0)
    Shader Model 6.4 5.1
    OpenGL 4.6 4.6
    OpenCL 2.1 1.1
    Vulkan 1.1.103 N/A
    CUDA 2.1
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 82 Mh/s
    Laptop size large
    Quick Sync +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares