Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Quadro 500M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro 500M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro 500M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro 500M
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Plus Graphics 650 | Quadro 500M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 500M has 133% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro 500M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 31 GB more memory, than Quadro 500M.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is used in Laptops, and Quadro 500M - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro 500M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro 500M is 400 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro 500M - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 500M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 150−160 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 285% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 500M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Dota 2 is 165% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Fortnite is 204% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Grand Theft Auto V is 226% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Minecraft is 79% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 768p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 20−22 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in World of Tanks is 140% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Plus Graphics 650 | Quadro 500M | |
| Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | Fermi |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GF108 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 3 January 2017 | 22 February 2011 |
| Pipelines | 48 | 96 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 585 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 55.20 | 11.20 |
| Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | 268.8 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.103 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |