Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Quadro CX
When choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro CX, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro CX.
Quadro CX
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650 | Quadro CX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 1536 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Quadro CX has 900% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro CX uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro CX has 1504 GB more memory, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is used in Laptops, and Quadro CX - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro CX - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro CX is 302 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro CX - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Battlefield 5 is 171% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 90−95 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 48% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Dota 2 is 41% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Far Cry 5 is 225% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Fortnite is 80% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Forza Horizon 4 is 162% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Grand Theft Auto V is 81% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Minecraft is 31% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 175% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 260% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in World of Tanks is 34% more, than Quadro CX. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650 | Quadro CX | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 3 January 2017 | 11 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 48 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 602 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 55.20 | 38.53 |
Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | N/A |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Radeon R9 M385X
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs GeForce GTX 650
- Quadro CX vs Radeon R9 M385X
- Quadro CX vs GeForce GTX 650
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs GeForce GT 645M
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Quadro CX vs GeForce GT 645M
- Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics