Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Quadro FX 4800
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro FX 4800. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro FX 4800. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro FX 4800
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650 | Quadro FX 4800 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 1536 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 900% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro FX 4800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1504 GB more memory, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 4800 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro FX 4800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro FX 4800 is 302 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 4800 - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Battlefield 5 is 137% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 38% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Dota 2 is 35% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Far Cry 5 is 175% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Fortnite is 63% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Grand Theft Auto V is 61% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Minecraft is 12% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in World of Tanks is 34% more, than Quadro FX 4800. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650 | Quadro FX 4800 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 3 January 2017 | 11 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 48 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 602 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 55.20 | 38.53 |
Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | N/A |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |