Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Quadro K1000M

    In this comparison between Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro K1000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Plus Graphics 650 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K1000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
    Iris Plus Graphics 650 Check Price
    Quadro K1000M Check Price

    Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro K1000M are Laptop Graphics Cards

    Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro K1000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 or Quadro K1000M here:

    Iris Plus Graphics 650 Laptops
    Quadro K1000M Laptops

    Main Specs

      Iris Plus Graphics 650 Quadro K1000M
    Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 45 Watt
    Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 MXM-A (3.0)
    Memory type DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 DDR3
    Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 2 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
      Check Price Check Price
    • Quadro K1000M has 200% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
    • Iris Plus Graphics 650 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro K1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
    • Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 30 GB more memory, than Quadro K1000M.
    • Iris Plus Graphics 650 is used in Laptops, and Quadro K1000M - in Mobile workstations.
    • Iris Plus Graphics 650 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro K1000M - with Kepler.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro K1000M is 550 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
    • Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro K1000M - by 28 nm process technology.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 8−9 0−1
    ultra / 1080p 5−6 −
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
    low / 720p 18−20 1−2
    medium / 1080p 10−11 0−1
    The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than Quadro K1000M.

    Full Specs

      Iris Plus Graphics 650 Quadro K1000M
    Architecture Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake Kepler
    Code name Kaby Lake GT3e N14P-Q1
    Type Laptop Mobile workstation
    Release date 3 January 2017 1 June 2012
    Pipelines 48 192
    Core clock speed 300 MHz 850 MHz
    Boost Clock 1100 MHz
    Transistor count 189 million 1,270 million
    Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
    Texture fill rate 55.20 13.60
    Floating-point performance 883 gflops 326.4 gflops
    Memory bus width 64/128 Bit 128 Bit
    Memory clock speed 1800 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB/s
    Shared memory + -
    DirectX 12 (12_1) 12 (11_0)
    Shader Model 6.4 5.1
    OpenGL 4.6 4.6
    OpenCL 2.1 1.2
    Vulkan 1.1.103 1.1.126
    CUDA +
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 10 Mh/s
    Laptop size medium sized
    Optimus +
    Quick Sync +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares