Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Quadro M600M

In this comparison between Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro M600M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Plus Graphics 650 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M600M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro M600M are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro M600M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 or Quadro M600M here:

Main Specs

  Iris Plus Graphics 650 Quadro M600M
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 30 Watt
Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors None
Memory type DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 2 GB
Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
  Check Price Check Price
  • Quadro M600M has 100% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
  • Iris Plus Graphics 650 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro M600M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
  • Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 30 GB more memory, than Quadro M600M.
  • Iris Plus Graphics 650 is used in Laptops, and Quadro M600M - in Mobile workstations.
  • Iris Plus Graphics 650 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro M600M - with Maxwell.
  • Core clock speed of Quadro M600M is 537 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
  • Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro M600M - by 28 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 8−9 10−11
ultra / 1080p 5−6 6−7
QHD / 1440p 0−1 1−2
low / 720p 18−20 21−24
medium / 1080p 10−11 12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M600M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 30% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.

Full Specs

  Iris Plus Graphics 650 Quadro M600M
Architecture Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake Maxwell
Code name Kaby Lake GT3e GM107
Type Laptop Mobile workstation
Release date 3 January 2017 2 October 2015
Pipelines 48 384
Core clock speed 300 MHz 837 MHz
Boost Clock 1100 MHz 876 MHz
Transistor count 189 million 1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 55.20 14.02
Floating-point performance 883 gflops 863.2 gflops
Memory bus width 64/128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth 80 GB/s
Shared memory + -
DirectX 12 (12_1) 12
Shader Model 6.4 5.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
OpenCL 2.1 1.2
Vulkan 1.1.103 1.1.126
CUDA 5.0
Laptop size large
Optimus +
Quick Sync +
Display Port 1.2
3D Vision Pro +
Mosaic +
nView Display Management +
  Check Price Check Price