Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Quadro P2000
When comparing Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro P2000, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro P2000 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Quadro P2000
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
32 GB
5 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
4x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro P2000 has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro P2000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 27 GB more memory, than Quadro P2000.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is used in Laptops, and Quadro P2000 - in Desktops.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro P2000 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of Quadro P2000 is 776 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro P2000 - by 16 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
8−9
35−40
ultra / 1080p
5−6
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
18−20
60−65
medium / 1080p
10−11
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 330% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
14−16
55−60
ultra / 1080p
12−14
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
30−33
100−110
medium / 1080p
14−16
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Battlefield 5 is 288% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
150−160
250−260
medium / 768p
120−130
220−230
ultra / 1080p
60−65
180−190
QHD / 1440p
35−40
110−120
4K / 2160p
27−30
70−75
high / 768p
90−95
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 113% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
85−90
120−130
medium / 768p
65−70
110−120
ultra / 1080p
40−45
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
10−11
45−50
ultra / 1080p
9−10
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
30−33
4K / 2160p
4−5
14−16
low / 720p
21−24
80−85
medium / 1080p
10−11
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Far Cry 5 is 336% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
16−18
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
50−55
QHD / 1440p
−
30−33
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
65−70
180−190
medium / 1080p
27−30
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Fortnite is 232% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
45−50
QHD / 1440p
2−3
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
30−35
110−120
medium / 1080p
16−18
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 306% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
60−65
140−150
medium / 768p
50−55
130−140
high / 1080p
16−18
70−75
ultra / 1080p
7−8
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 182% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
5−6
24−27
ultra / 1080p
4−5
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
1−2
9−10
low / 720p
14−16
70−75
medium / 1080p
7−8
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Metro Exodus is 450% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
95−100
130−140
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
85−90
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Minecraft is 34% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
100−110
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
8−9
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−12
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 720p
14−16
70−75
medium / 1080p
12−14
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 250% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
30−35
130−140
medium / 768p
20−22
85−90
high / 1080p
10−12
50−55
ultra / 1080p
7−8
27−30
4K / 2160p
6−7
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 326% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
55−60
high / 768p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Quadro P2000
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Pascal
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
GP106
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
3 January 2017
6 February 2017
Pipelines
48
1024
Core clock speed
300 MHz
1076 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
1480 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
16 nm
Texture fill rate
55.20
94.72
Floating-point performance
883 gflops
3,031 gflops
Length
201 mm
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
160 Bit
Memory clock speed
7008 MHz
Memory bandwidth
140.2 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
6.4
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.103
1.2.131
CUDA
6.1
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)
0.19 kh/s
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price