Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Radeon HD 7690M
In this comparison between Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Radeon HD 7690M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Plus Graphics 650 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 7690M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Radeon HD 7690M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Radeon HD 7690M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 or Radeon HD 7690M here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Radeon HD 7690M
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
20 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
GDDR5/DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
32 GB
1 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon HD 7690M has 33% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon HD 7690M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 31 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 7690M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon HD 7690M - with Terascale 2.
Core clock speed of Radeon HD 7690M is 300 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 7690M - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
8−9
2−3
ultra / 1080p
5−6
0−1
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
12−14
medium / 1080p
10−11
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon HD 7690M.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
12−14
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−33
14−16
medium / 1080p
14−16
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Battlefield 5 is 111% more, than Radeon HD 7690M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Radeon HD 7690M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
150−160
120−130
medium / 768p
120−130
90−95
ultra / 1080p
60−65
40−45
QHD / 1440p
35−40
21−24
4K / 2160p
27−30
16−18
high / 768p
90−95
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 36% more, than Radeon HD 7690M.
low / 768p
55−60
65−70
ultra / 1080p
21−24
20−22
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7690M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
85−90
75−80
medium / 768p
65−70
45−50
ultra / 1080p
40−45
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Dota 2 is 32% more, than Radeon HD 7690M.
high / 1080p
10−11
2−3
ultra / 1080p
9−10
2−3
4K / 2160p
4−5
2−3
low / 720p
21−24
10−12
medium / 1080p
10−11
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Far Cry 5 is 175% more, than Radeon HD 7690M.
high / 1080p
16−18
10−11
ultra / 1080p
12−14
5−6
QHD / 1440p
−
3−4
low / 720p
65−70
50−55
medium / 1080p
27−30
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Fortnite is 63% more, than Radeon HD 7690M.
high / 1080p
14−16
5−6
ultra / 1080p
12−14
−
QHD / 1440p
2−3
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
30−35
18−20
medium / 1080p
16−18
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Forza Horizon 4 is 77% more, than Radeon HD 7690M.
low / 768p
60−65
45−50
medium / 768p
50−55
−
high / 1080p
16−18
4−5
ultra / 1080p
7−8
2−3
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Grand Theft Auto V is 61% more, than Radeon HD 7690M.
high / 1080p
5−6
2−3
ultra / 1080p
4−5
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
4−5
medium / 1080p
7−8
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Radeon HD 7690M.
low / 768p
95−100
90−95
high / 1080p
90−95
80−85
ultra / 1080p
85−90
70−75
medium / 1080p
95−100
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Minecraft is 12% more, than Radeon HD 7690M.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
35−40
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Radeon HD 7690M.
ultra / 1080p
8−9
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
14−16
6−7
medium / 1080p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than Radeon HD 7690M.
low / 768p
30−35
10−11
medium / 768p
20−22
8−9
high / 1080p
10−12
4−5
ultra / 1080p
7−8
4−5
4K / 2160p
6−7
1−2
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than Radeon HD 7690M.
low / 768p
90−95
70−75
medium / 768p
45−50
35−40
ultra / 1080p
21−24
14−16
high / 768p
40−45
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in World of Tanks is 30% more, than Radeon HD 7690M.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Radeon HD 7690M
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Terascale 2
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
Thames XT / XTX
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
3 January 2017
7 June 2011
Pipelines
48
480
Core clock speed
300 MHz
600 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
725 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
716 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
55.20
17.40
Floating-point performance
883 gflops
696.0 gflops
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
3600/1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.4
5.0
OpenGL
4.6
4.4
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.103
N/A
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
