Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Radeon R7 A360
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Radeon R7 A360. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Radeon R7 A360. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R7 A360
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650 | Radeon R7 A360 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon R7 A360 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 31 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 A360.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 A360 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon R7 A360 - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 A360 is 425 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 A360 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A360 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
high / 768p | 90−95 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 285% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A360 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Dota 2 is 165% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Fortnite is 204% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Grand Theft Auto V is 226% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Minecraft is 79% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
low / 768p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 20−22 | − |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in World of Tanks is 140% more, than Radeon R7 A360. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650 | Radeon R7 A360 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Meso |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 3 January 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 48 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 980 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,550 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 55.20 | 23.52 |
Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | 864.0 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3.6 GB/s | |
Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | 1.2 |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |