FirePro M4100 vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
In this comparison between FirePro M4100 and Iris Plus Graphics 655 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4100 will be the best choice, for others Iris Plus Graphics 655 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro M4100 and Iris Plus Graphics 655 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: FirePro M4100 and Iris Plus Graphics 655 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4100 or Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4100
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
PCIe 3.0 x1
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro M4100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
FirePro M4100 is used in Mobile workstations, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - in Laptops.
FirePro M4100 is build with GCN architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
Core clock speed of FirePro M4100 is 370 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
FirePro M4100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
1−2
12−14
ultra / 1080p
0−1
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
12−14
27−30
medium / 1080p
3−4
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than FirePro M4100.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
4−5
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
16−18
45−50
medium / 1080p
6−7
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Battlefield 5 is 222% more, than FirePro M4100.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro M4100 and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
120−130
190−200
medium / 768p
95−100
160−170
ultra / 1080p
40−45
85−90
QHD / 1440p
24−27
45−50
4K / 2160p
18−20
30−33
high / 768p
65−70
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 74% more, than FirePro M4100.
low / 768p
85−90
55−60
ultra / 1080p
16−18
35−40
medium / 1080p
40−45
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p
75−80
100−110
medium / 768p
50−55
85−90
ultra / 1080p
24−27
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 62% more, than FirePro M4100.
high / 1080p
2−3
14−16
ultra / 1080p
2−3
14−16
4K / 2160p
1−2
5−6
low / 720p
12−14
30−35
medium / 1080p
3−4
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Far Cry 5 is 325% more, than FirePro M4100.
high / 1080p
10−11
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
16−18
QHD / 1440p
2−3
16−18
low / 720p
50−55
85−90
medium / 1080p
12−14
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 137% more, than FirePro M4100.
high / 1080p
4−5
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
low / 720p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
7−8
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Forza Horizon 4 is 210% more, than FirePro M4100.
low / 768p
45−50
75−80
medium / 768p
−
65−70
high / 1080p
5−6
24−27
ultra / 1080p
2−3
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
medium / 720p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 105% more, than FirePro M4100.
high / 1080p
1−2
8−9
ultra / 1080p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
5−6
24−27
medium / 1080p
3−4
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than FirePro M4100.
low / 768p
90−95
100−110
high / 1080p
85−90
−
ultra / 1080p
70−75
95−100
medium / 1080p
90−95
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 20% more, than FirePro M4100.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
16−18
low / 720p
27−30
50−55
medium / 1080p
14−16
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than FirePro M4100.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
4−5
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
24−27
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 240% more, than FirePro M4100.
low / 768p
12−14
45−50
medium / 768p
9−10
27−30
high / 1080p
4−5
16−18
ultra / 1080p
3−4
9−10
4K / 2160p
0−1
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 257% more, than FirePro M4100.
low / 768p
75−80
95−100
medium / 768p
35−40
55−60
ultra / 1080p
16−18
30−35
high / 768p
30−35
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 46% more, than FirePro M4100.
Full Specs
FirePro M4100
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Architecture
GCN
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Code name
Mars
Kaby Lake GT3e
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
1 October 2013
1 September 2017
Pipelines
384
48
Core clock speed
670 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
Transistor count
950 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
16.08
50.40
Floating-point performance
514.6 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.1
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.1.103
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
74 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
