FirePro M4150 vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
When choosing between FirePro M4150 and Iris Plus Graphics 655, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M4150 and Iris Plus Graphics 655.
FirePro M4150
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3/DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - in Laptops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 415 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- FirePro M4150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Battlefield 5 is 222% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 80% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 72% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Far Cry 5 is 325% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 137% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Forza Horizon 4 is 177% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 105% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 21% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 316% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 340% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
| Code name | Opal | Kaby Lake GT3e |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | 1 September 2017 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 50.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.103 |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |