FirePro V5800 vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro V5800 and Iris Plus Graphics 655. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro V5800 and Iris Plus Graphics 655. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro V5800
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
FirePro V5800 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro V5800 has 393% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 390 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Battlefield 5 is 107% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro V5800 and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 52% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 50% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Far Cry 5 is 88% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 65% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 60% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 14% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 77% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 92% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 30% more, than FirePro V5800. |
Full Specs
FirePro V5800 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
Code name | Juniper | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 26 April 2010 | 1 September 2017 |
Pipelines | 800 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 50.40 |
Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.103 |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |