FirePro V7900 vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
When comparing FirePro V7900 and Iris Plus Graphics 655, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro V7900 and Iris Plus Graphics 655 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
FirePro V7900
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Power consumption (TDP)
151 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
4x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro V7900 has 906% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
FirePro V7900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
FirePro V7900 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - in Laptops.
FirePro V7900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
Core clock speed of FirePro V7900 is 425 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
FirePro V7900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
10−12
12−14
ultra / 1080p
6−7
7−8
QHD / 1440p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
24−27
27−30
medium / 1080p
14−16
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 18% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p
18−20
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
18−20
QHD / 1440p
1−2
4−5
low / 720p
35−40
45−50
medium / 1080p
20−22
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Battlefield 5 is 27% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro V7900 and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
180−190
190−200
medium / 768p
150−160
160−170
ultra / 1080p
75−80
85−90
QHD / 1440p
45−50
45−50
4K / 2160p
30−33
30−33
high / 768p
110−120
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
30−33
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p
95−100
100−110
medium / 768p
80−85
85−90
ultra / 1080p
50−55
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
4K / 2160p
5−6
5−6
low / 720p
30−33
30−35
medium / 1080p
14−16
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Far Cry 5 is 13% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p
20−22
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
80−85
85−90
medium / 1080p
35−40
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 10% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p
18−20
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
QHD / 1440p
5−6
7−8
low / 720p
40−45
45−50
medium / 1080p
21−24
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Forza Horizon 4 is 20% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p
70−75
75−80
medium / 768p
60−65
65−70
high / 1080p
21−24
24−27
ultra / 1080p
9−10
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p
7−8
8−9
ultra / 1080p
5−6
6−7
4K / 2160p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
21−24
24−27
medium / 1080p
9−10
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Metro Exodus is 11% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p
100−110
100−110
ultra / 1080p
90−95
95−100
medium / 1080p
100−105
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 2% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p
20−22
21−24
ultra / 1080p
16−18
16−18
low / 720p
45−50
50−55
medium / 1080p
21−24
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p
12−14
12−14
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
24−27
medium / 1080p
12−14
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 7% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p
40−45
45−50
medium / 768p
24−27
27−30
high / 1080p
14−16
16−18
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
4K / 2160p
7−8
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 15% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p
95−100
95−100
medium / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
27−30
30−35
high / 768p
45−50
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than FirePro V7900.
Full Specs
FirePro V7900
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Code name
Cayman
Kaby Lake GT3e
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
24 May 2011
1 September 2017
Pipelines
1280
48
Core clock speed
725 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
Transistor count
2,640 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
58.00
50.40
Floating-point performance
1,856.0 gflops
Length
279 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.0
6.4
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.1
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.103
Bus support
PCIe 2.1 x16
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
171 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
Form factor
full height / full length
StereoOutput3D
+
DisplayPort count
4
Dual-link DVI support
+
Check Price
Check Price
