FirePro W8100 vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
When choosing between FirePro W8100 and Iris Plus Graphics 655, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W8100 and Iris Plus Graphics 655.
FirePro W8100
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
FirePro W8100 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro W8100 has 1366% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- FirePro W8100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- FirePro W8100 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - in Laptops.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 524 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- FirePro W8100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 176% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 173% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 63% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 176% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 128% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 162% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 125% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 210% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 23% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 181% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 11% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. |
Full Specs
FirePro W8100 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
Code name | Hawaii | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2014 | 1 September 2017 |
Pipelines | 2560 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 131.8 | 50.40 |
Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | |
Length | 279 mm | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.103 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W8100 vs Quadro P2000
- FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 mobile
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Quadro P2000
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs GeForce GTX 1650 mobile
- FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 485M
- FirePro W8100 vs Quadro K4100M
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs GeForce GTX 485M
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Quadro K4100M