FireStream 9250 vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
In this comparison between FireStream 9250 and Iris Plus Graphics 655 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9250 will be the best choice, for others Iris Plus Graphics 655 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9250
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9250 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 900% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 325 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 220% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 63% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 59% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Far Cry 5 is 240% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 123% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Forza Horizon 4 is 154% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 76% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Metro Exodus is 275% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 16% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 64% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 175% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 39% more, than FireStream 9250. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9250 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
Code name | RV770 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 1 September 2017 |
Pipelines | 800 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 50.40 |
Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.103 |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 650M
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 640
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs GeForce GT 650M
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs GeForce GT 640
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTX 485M
- FireStream 9250 vs Quadro K4100M
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs GeForce GTX 485M
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Quadro K4100M