FireStream 9370 vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FireStream 9370 and Iris Plus Graphics 655, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FireStream 9370 stacks up against Iris Plus Graphics 655, check out specs charts below.
FireStream 9370
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 525 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
FireStream 9370 and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
FireStream 9370 and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9370 and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
FireStream 9370 and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
FireStream 9370 and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
FireStream 9370 and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
FireStream 9370 and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
FireStream 9370 and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
FireStream 9370 and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
FireStream 9370 and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
FireStream 9370 and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
FireStream 9370 and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
FireStream 9370 and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
FireStream 9370 and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
FireStream 9370 and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
FireStream 9370 and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
Code name | Cypress | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 1 September 2017 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 50.40 |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.103 |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 485M
- FireStream 9370 vs Quadro K4100M
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs GeForce GTX 485M
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Quadro K4100M